Cursor
★ 4.7An AI-first code IDE — a VS Code fork using Claude/GPT as the backend.
Who is Cursor good for?
- Developers who want a fast AI workflow — Cmd+K to edit, Cmd+L to chat in-file
- People already comfortable with VS Code — switch in 5 minutes, every VS Code extension still works
- Solo devs or small teams — personal or team billing
Pricing (2026)
| Plan | USD/month | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 0 | 2,000 completions, 50 slow chats |
| Pro | 20 | Unlimited completions, 500 fast Premium requests, agent mode |
| Business | 40 | + admin, security, SSO |
Standout features
Tab autocomplete
Press Tab → Cursor predicts the next 5–15 lines of code based on project context. Astonishingly accurate once it’s familiar with your codebase.
Cmd+K (Edit)
Highlight code, type “add error handling” → AI edits inline.
Composer / Agent mode
“Refactor the auth module from JWT to sessions” → Cursor reads multiple files, edits them, and asks for confirmation before applying.
.cursorrules
A config file that customizes AI behavior for your project (output language, code conventions, etc.).
Compared to Claude Code
| Cursor | Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | Full IDE | CLI (terminal) |
| For beginners | 🥇 easier | 🥉 command line |
| Speed for pros | 🥈 | 🥇 keyboard-driven |
| Agent autonomy | 🥈 | 🥇 stronger on long tasks |
| VCS integration | 🥇 | 🥈 |
→ Visual-first users pick Cursor. Terminal-native pros pick Claude Code. Many use both.
Using it from Vietnam
- Download cursor.com normally
- Pay with an international Visa/Mastercard
- UI and docs are English only — but the AI handles Vietnamese well if you comment/prompt in Vietnamese
✓ Pros
- Smooth AI integration — autocomplete, chat, edit, agent
- Tab autocomplete is much smarter than Copilot
- Lets you choose between models (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
- One-click migration from VS Code — your extensions still work
✗ Cons
- You need a paid plan for the strongest models
- UI is English only
- Requires constant internet